Transcript:
A dutiful and historic example
is what happened to the minimum wage legislation.
It has been before the Supreme Court three times.
On the basis of the recorded votes of the individual
justices, there have been seven who have voted in
favor of its constitutionality, and six against it.
Yet the legislation was invalidated, simply because
a bare majority of the particular set of justices
who happen to be on the court at the time was opposed
to that kind of legislation. Congress wanted it, the
people wanted it. Seven out of thirteen justices wanted
it, but the other six did not, so the law went into
the ash can. If that is not government by men, I would
like to know what it is. Even the Republican Party
refused to defend such a flagrant act of judicial
usurpation. Ten days after the Supreme Court's decision
arbitrarily brushing aside the New York Minimum Wage
Act For Women, the Republican Party solemnly pledged
itself to support state minimum wage legislation for
women, and recorded its belief that such legislation
is within the Constitution as it now stands. This
is but one more public recognition of the fact that
our Constitution is what the justices choose to make
it.
Background:
On February 13, 1937, liberal
Republican Senator Robert M. La Follette, Jr. spoke
out in support of President Franklin Roosevelt's controversial
plan to neutralize Supreme Court justices who were
hostile to the New Deal. Over the previous two years,
the high court had struck down several key pieces
of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws
delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority
to the executive branch and the federal government.
Flushed with his landslide re-election in 1936, President
Roosevelt issued a proposal in February 1937 to provide
retirement at full pay for all members of the court
over seventy. If a justice refused to retire, an "assistant"
with full voting rights was to be appointed, thus
ensuring Roosevelt a liberal majority. Most Republicans
and many Democrats in Congress opposed the so-called
"court-packing" plan. However, in April,
before the bill came to vote, two justices came over
to the liberal side, and by a narrow majority upheld
the National Labor Relations Act and the Social Security
Act, acknowledging that the national economy had grown
to such a degree that federal regulation and control
was now warranted. Roosevelt's reorganization plan
was thus unnecessary, and in July the Senate struck
it down by a vote of seventy to twenty-two. Soon after,
Roosevelt had the opportunity to nominate his first
Supreme Court justice, and by 1942, all but two of
the justices were his appointees.